| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
smallcurd Altar Boy
Joined: 18 Apr 2005 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Wednesday April 20th, 2005 20:58 Post subject: one question.... |
|
|
I made a switch from fruity loops to buzz, i found buzz a lot more interesting and practical than FL for the kind of music I make. Anyways, one thing about FL is that you could render your projects as a .wav. There were no limitations on cpu when you did this. In buzz you have to record(although even vstis in buzz run faster, so i havn't had a problem yet). What if I have some rediculuis set-up where my cpu can't handle it, how could I get a clean recording?
Also is there a way to automate the bpm like in FL? If there are no ways around these questions then its fine, i'm very impressed with buzz. It was a bit stange and lame looking when i started but soon it became super easy and efficient for me. Thanks for your input. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fuzzpilz Chief Astrologician Of The Vatican
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 229
|
Posted: Wednesday April 20th, 2005 21:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| Recordings will be clean even when high CPU use makes it sound choppy while you're actually recording. You can automate the bpm by creating patterns for the Master. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smallcurd Altar Boy
Joined: 18 Apr 2005 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thursday April 21st, 2005 0:32 Post subject: |
|
|
thank you.
Oh yeah is there some sort of simple sample and hold effect where can just grab a certain number of samples for like 8 ticks and then disengage it and have it play normally? when buzzmachines comes back ill look there.
nevermind I found one or two or three....etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|